NEWS PLANNING & PLACE

Secretary of State overturns council decision to waive Southgate site Environmental Impact Assessment

Proposals for up to 200 flats in high-rise tower blocks have potentially significant impacts on Exe Estuary avian flightpaths, Exeter Cathedral skyline, listed buildings and ancient city walls placing protected landscapes and heritage assets at risk.

Exeter city council Liveable exeter Exeter local plan Exeter development fund Exeter cathedral Exeter city centre

An Exeter City Council decision to waive an Environmental Impact Assessment of its own proposals to develop the Liveable Exeter Southgate site has been overturned by the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities.

The 3.5 acre Southgate site, which is allocated for development in the new Exeter Local Plan, includes the Magdalen Street surface car park and the Western Way gyratory that surrounds it as well as a rough sleepers night shelter. A remodelled highways layout would replace the existing gyratory with a series of T-junctions.

The city council put forward outline proposals to develop the site, which meets the Exeter Development Fund criterion of being part-owned by two public authorities – the city and county councils – in September last year.

It said it would build up to 200 new flats in high-rise tower blocks there, although the 285 dwellings per hectare this entails is nearly double the city centre residential density its local plan recommends.

The city council, acting as developer, commissioned a planning consultant to request a screening opinion from the city council, acting as local planning authority, as to whether an Environmental Impact Assessment would be required for the development proposals.

The request said: “It is not unusual for councils to act as project developers and as local planning authority, and in such cases there is always a clear separation between the council personnel acting in the respective functions to ensure objectivity on the part of the local planning authority. That is the case for this project.”

An accompanying screening report concluded that “the proposed development is not likely to have significant effects on the environment”.

The city council agreed with its consultant, confirming three weeks later that it had “determined that an Environmental Impact Assessment is not required, as the proposed development is unlikely to have any significant effects on the environment by virtue of factors such as its nature, size or location.”

Southgate redevelopment redline plan

Southgate redevelopment redline plan. Source: Exeter City Council.

Natural England disagreed, saying that the proposals risked “potential likely significant effects on statutorily designated nature conservation sites or landscapes” in the Exe Estuary.

Historic England also disagreed with the council consultant, saying “the scope of any potential heritage impact is likely to be much wider than identified” in the screening report, and that the development proposals could have “a significant impact on the historic environment”.

It identified numerous heritage assets they could adversely affect. These include Exeter’s ancient city walls, a scheduled monument, and their relationship with the historic townscape and road networks, nearby Exeter Cathedral, many grade I, II* and II buildings in the vicinity, the city’s historic quay, Colleton Crescent, the wider rural hinterland and the designated Area of Archaeological Importance in which the development site sits, one of only five in the country.

The council’s draft local plan also acknowledges the importance of the conservation areas in which the Southgate site sits, saying that any development there must be “informed by archaeological and heritage assessment, evaluation and mitigation” and should enhance their character and appearance while protecting “the settings of the city walls and all listed buildings” nearby.

It provides its own account of nearby listed buildings to protect, although it bullishly says the site “provides a great opportunity” to create “an impressive and memorable city centre gateway”.

The statement of reasons provided by the city council for its decision to waive an Environmental Impact Assessment of its site development proposals also acknowledges the existence of these protected areas and features.

However it does so only cursorily, and says significant effects on them are unlikely on the grounds that any impacts could be mitigated later, at the planning application stage.

The council consultant’s screening report is even more circumspect. It doesn’t mention the cathedral, the quay, Colleton Crescent or any of the buildings on the council’s local plan list at all, then concludes that “the proposed development would cause no harm to the scheduled monument or its setting” and that “the previously developed nature of the site indicates that significant archaeological impacts are unlikely”.

Southgate development site heritage map

Southgate development site heritage map (the allocated site boundary has since been amended as below). Source: Exeter City Council.

Following the council’s decision, Devon Archaeological Society wrote to the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to request his intervention. It asked how the council consultant could make “such a sweeping statement”, adding: “The quantification of the possible impact as ‘unlikely’ is entirely unsupported by sound evidence, and remains no more than supposition.”

It said the screening report “considerably underestimates the impact of the proposal on the heritage setting of this part of the city and on the specifics of the archaeological deposits of the site itself”, which it said would “almost certainly be significantly greater than the negligible level implied by this report”.

It pointed out that the council had neither taken advice from its own national heritage consultee nor, apparently, sought the advice of its own conservation and archaeology officer.

It concluded that the council’s screening opinion “appears to have been written with the intention of eliminating the requirement for an Environmental Impact Assessment” and that the council’s approach did not comply with The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.

Southgate development site local plan allocation map

Southgate development site local plan allocation map. Source: Exeter City Council.

The Secretary of State’s response considered the proposed development’s potential for significant effects on the Exe Estuary, citing the likelihood that the populations of more than 20,000 bird flocks that are drawn to the estuary during wintering “may be significantly cumulatively affected by changing skylines with regard to their flightpaths”.

It also considered the likelihood that the proposed development would “alter the distinctive city skyline while impacting views towards Exeter Cathedral”, saying its “undefined height” made it “impossible to conclusively state the development will not be significantly visible to many people while disrupting key viewpoints”.

Also taking into account the Southgate site’s location within the designated Area of Archaeological Importance and two conservation areas, the proximity of numerous listed buildings, the scheduled monument status of the city’s ancient walls and its historical contextual townscape significance, the Secretary of State said “it is not possible to conclude there are no likely significant impacts on the heritage receptors near the site”.

The Secretary of State added that “the potential impacts of the proposal on the environment are likely to be significant” with “potential significant effects on designated and non-designated above and below ground heritage assets” and on the Exe Estuary “with respect to connectivity and specifically the flightpaths for wintering birds”.

He then concluded that the proposed development could have “significant cumulative effects” and that an “Environmental Impact Assessment is, therefore, necessary”.

alt

Exeter City Walls scheduled monument map. Source: Historic England.

The council will now have to provide detailed information on the potential impacts of its development proposals both on the Exe Estuary and on “all heritage assets likely to be affected”.

The Secretary of State says this should include “designated heritage assets and their settings, together with potential impacts on non-designated features of historic, architectural, archaeological, or artistic interest” which “may also be of national importance and make an important contribution to the character and local distinctiveness of an area and its sense of place”.

Exeter’s ancient city walls already appear on Historic England’s Heritage at Risk Register, although Exeter Civic Society believes that the register’s references to “minor localised problems” and “plant growth” significantly “underplays the problems” with the walls.

It says: “Significant sections of the wall including by the catacombs, the City Gate Hotel, the castle gatehouse and especially in the Northernhay Gardens and Athelstan’s Tower areas are fenced off and have been for some time (years), with signs warning the public to keep out.”

It also points out that “the arched walk through from Rougemont Gardens to Northernhay Gardens has been fenced off and blocked up for at least two years”, adding that “this unfortunately makes a mockery of the city wall trail, one of the council’s most high-profile tourist attractions.”

Devon Archaeological Society describes the state of the city walls as “a matter of growing concern”. It says it recently identified thirteen different sections that are “fenced off, either because there is cause for concern about their structural condition, or for public protection, or because a collapse has actually occurred.”



Recent headlines
Recent headlines
Exeter Labour 2024 campaign leaflet

Council raids community fund for £6 million to pay for eight year-old food waste collection promise

Exeter Community Lottery homepage

Australian multinational is biggest council lottery winner as 92% of local causes receive less than £500

Devon County Council Devon and Torbay devolution deal consultation results bar chart

County council to impose new local government tier despite majority opposition to devolution deal

Electoral Commission voting options graphic

When, where and how to vote in the 2024 Exeter local elections

Auditor value for money arrangements recommendations summary chart

Auditor broadens inquiry to include Exeter City Futures and ex-CEO secondment to liquidated company

Recent stories
Exeter Labour 2024 campaign leaflet

COMMENT  ⁄  DEMOCRACY & GOVERNANCE

Council raids community fund for £6 million to pay for eight year-old food waste collection promise

Emergency decision to finance materials reclamation facility investment taken less than a week before 2024 local elections campaign officially began.

Exeter Community Lottery homepage

ANALYSIS  ⁄  COMMUNITY & SOCIETY

Australian multinational is biggest council lottery winner as 92% of local causes receive less than £500

Operator collects £26,000 and city council £16,000 in first nine months as public support for Exeter voluntary and community organisations turned into private profit.

Devon County Council Devon and Torbay devolution deal consultation results bar chart

COMMENT  ⁄  DEMOCRACY & GOVERNANCE

County council to impose new local government tier despite majority opposition to devolution deal

Emptiness of claims that new combined authority will be accountable reflected in failure to respect consultation results as all eight Devon district councils decry prospective democratic deficit.

Electoral Commission voting options graphic

BRIEFINGS  ⁄  DEMOCRACY & GOVERNANCE

When, where and how to vote in the 2024 Exeter local elections

Our guide to casting your ballot in person, by post and by proxy as well as voter ID requirements and new regulations for postal votes.

Auditor value for money arrangements recommendations summary chart

ANALYSIS  ⁄  DEMOCRACY & GOVERNANCE

Auditor broadens inquiry to include Exeter City Futures and ex-CEO secondment to liquidated company

More 'significant weaknesses' found in city council governance and financial and performance management arrangements while St Sidwell's Point valued at £7 million less than build cost and £370,000 ex-CEO final year pay and benefits confirmed.

On Our Radar
More stories
Devon County Council SEND spending 2019-20 to 2024-25 bar chart

NEWS  ⁄  COMMUNITY & SOCIETY

SEND deficit deal demands £50m budget cuts, £13m asset sales and use of £20m financial reserves

Department for Education to contribute £95 million over nine years, but terms of deal require Devon County Council to break even on SEND within two years despite five years of multi-million pound overspends.

Devon & Torbay Combined County Authority governance structure diagram

COMMENT  ⁄  DEMOCRACY & GOVERNANCE

Devon devolution deal to create unaccountable local government layer for paltry £16 million payoff

Democratic deficit to increase as city and district councils lose control over housing and prosperity funding and transport policy powers moved out of reach, while county council plans to approve deal irrespective of public consultation outcome.

Exeter St Thomas station

COMMENT  ⁄  TRANSPORT & MOBILITY

Access for all? Mobility-impaired passengers still cannot catch their train from some Exeter stations

National railway accessibility policies fail to deliver local transport network access as Exeter St Thomas station improvement funding bid decision awaited.

Wonford Community Wellbeing Hub option seven plan crop

ANALYSIS  ⁄  COMMUNITY & SOCIETY

£1+ million for Wonford community hub project development but £7 million build finance not yet found

City council presented £750,000 'feasibility proposal' as progression of existing plans despite having to start again after three years to cut costs, with Exeter City Living awarded £550,000 project contract.

Proposed Heavitree Road bus lane bus priority signals

NEWS  ⁄  TRANSPORT & MOBILITY

Bus corridor consultation presents more incremental changes to Exeter road network

£2.4 million Heavitree and Pinhoe Road 'upgrades' have 'potential for an approximate four-minute journey time saving' at peak times along length of each corridor.

Devon County Council 2023-24 vs 2024-25 service delivery budgets bar graph

ANALYSIS  ⁄  DEMOCRACY & GOVERNANCE

£50 million county council 2024-25 service delivery cuts concealed by £93 million costs increases

Figures essentially unaffected by budget scrutiny process during which councillors sought details of where and how cuts would fall but received few proper answers.

Spotlight
Auditor value for money arrangements recommendations summary chart

Auditor broadens inquiry to include Exeter City Futures and ex-CEO secondment to liquidated company

More 'significant weaknesses' found in city council governance and financial and performance management arrangements while St Sidwell's Point valued at £7 million less than build cost and £370,000 ex-CEO final year pay and benefits confirmed.

All topics

ACCOUNTABILITY & TRANSPARENCY ACCOUNTABILITY & TRANSPARENCY ACCOUNTABILITY & TRANSPARENCY   ACCOUNTABILITY & TRANSPARENCY ACCOUNTABILITY & TRANSPARENCY ACCOUNTABILITY & TRANSPARENCY   AIR QUALITY AIR QUALITY AIR QUALITY   COP26 COP26 COP26   COVID-19 COVID-19 COVID-19   CITYPOINT CITYPOINT CITYPOINT   CLIFTON HILL SPORTS CENTRE CLIFTON HILL SPORTS CENTRE CLIFTON HILL SPORTS CENTRE   CLIMATE CRISIS CLIMATE CRISIS CLIMATE CRISIS   CO-LIVING CO-LIVING CO-LIVING   COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY   CONGESTION CONGESTION CONGESTION   COUNCIL TAX COUNCIL TAX COUNCIL TAX   CROWN ESTATE CROWN ESTATE CROWN ESTATE   CYCLING & WALKING CYCLING & WALKING CYCLING & WALKING   DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT   DEVON & CORNWALL POLICE DEVON & CORNWALL POLICE DEVON & CORNWALL POLICE   DEVON CARBON PLAN DEVON CARBON PLAN DEVON CARBON PLAN   DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL   DEVON PENSION FUND DEVON PENSION FUND DEVON PENSION FUND   EAST DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL EAST DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL EAST DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL   EXETER AIRPORT EXETER AIRPORT EXETER AIRPORT   EXETER CANAL & QUAY TRUST EXETER CANAL & QUAY TRUST EXETER CANAL & QUAY TRUST   EXETER CATHEDRAL EXETER CATHEDRAL EXETER CATHEDRAL   EXETER CHIEFS EXETER CHIEFS EXETER CHIEFS   EXETER CITY COUNCIL EXETER CITY COUNCIL EXETER CITY COUNCIL   EXETER CITY FUTURES EXETER CITY FUTURES EXETER CITY FUTURES   EXETER CITY LIVING EXETER CITY LIVING EXETER CITY LIVING   EXETER CLIMATE ACTION HUB EXETER CLIMATE ACTION HUB EXETER CLIMATE ACTION HUB   EXETER COLLEGE EXETER COLLEGE EXETER COLLEGE   EXETER CULTURE EXETER CULTURE EXETER CULTURE   EXETER DEVELOPMENT FUND EXETER DEVELOPMENT FUND EXETER DEVELOPMENT FUND   EXETER LIVE BETTER EXETER LIVE BETTER EXETER LIVE BETTER   EXETER LOCAL PLAN EXETER LOCAL PLAN EXETER LOCAL PLAN   EXETER PHOENIX EXETER PHOENIX EXETER PHOENIX   EXETER PRIDE EXETER PRIDE EXETER PRIDE   EXETER SCIENCE PARK EXETER SCIENCE PARK EXETER SCIENCE PARK   EXETER ST DAVID'S EXETER ST DAVID'S EXETER ST DAVID'S   EXETER CITY CENTRE EXETER CITY CENTRE EXETER CITY CENTRE   EXTINCTION REBELLION EXETER EXTINCTION REBELLION EXETER EXTINCTION REBELLION EXETER   FREEDOM OF INFORMATION FREEDOM OF INFORMATION FREEDOM OF INFORMATION   FRIDAYS FOR FUTURE EXETER FRIDAYS FOR FUTURE EXETER FRIDAYS FOR FUTURE EXETER   GENERAL ELECTIONS GENERAL ELECTIONS GENERAL ELECTIONS   GUILDHALL GUILDHALL GUILDHALL   HARLEQUINS HARLEQUINS HARLEQUINS   HEART OF THE SOUTH WEST LEP HEART OF THE SOUTH WEST LEP HEART OF THE SOUTH WEST LEP   HOUSING CRISIS HOUSING CRISIS HOUSING CRISIS   LGBTQIA+ LGBTQIA+ LGBTQIA+   LIBRARIES UNLIMITED LIBRARIES UNLIMITED LIBRARIES UNLIMITED   LIVEABLE EXETER PLACE BOARD LIVEABLE EXETER PLACE BOARD LIVEABLE EXETER PLACE BOARD   LIVEABLE EXETER LIVEABLE EXETER LIVEABLE EXETER   LOCAL INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY LOCAL INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY LOCAL INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY   LOCAL ELECTIONS LOCAL ELECTIONS LOCAL ELECTIONS   MAKETANK MAKETANK MAKETANK   MARSH BARTON MARSH BARTON MARSH BARTON   MET OFFICE MET OFFICE MET OFFICE   MID DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL MID DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL MID DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL   NET ZERO EXETER NET ZERO EXETER NET ZERO EXETER   NORTHERNHAY GARDENS NORTHERNHAY GARDENS NORTHERNHAY GARDENS   OXYGEN HOUSE OXYGEN HOUSE OXYGEN HOUSE   PARIS STREET PARIS STREET PARIS STREET   PARKING PARKING PARKING   PENINSULA TRANSPORT PENINSULA TRANSPORT PENINSULA TRANSPORT   PLANNING POLICY PLANNING POLICY PLANNING POLICY   PRINCESSHAY PRINCESSHAY PRINCESSHAY   PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT   PUBLIC CONSULTATION PUBLIC CONSULTATION PUBLIC CONSULTATION   PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH   PUBLIC PARKS PUBLIC PARKS PUBLIC PARKS   PUBLIC REALM PUBLIC REALM PUBLIC REALM   PUBLIC TRANSPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORT PUBLIC TRANSPORT   RAMM RAMM RAMM   REFUSE & RECYCLING REFUSE & RECYCLING REFUSE & RECYCLING   RETROFIT RETROFIT RETROFIT   ROYAL DEVON NHS TRUST ROYAL DEVON NHS TRUST ROYAL DEVON NHS TRUST   SIDWELL STREET SIDWELL STREET SIDWELL STREET   SOUTH WEST EXETER EXTENSION SOUTH WEST EXETER EXTENSION SOUTH WEST EXETER EXTENSION   SOUTH WEST WATER SOUTH WEST WATER SOUTH WEST WATER   SOUTHERNHAY SOUTHERNHAY SOUTHERNHAY   SPORT ENGLAND LOCAL DELIVERY PILOT SPORT ENGLAND LOCAL DELIVERY PILOT SPORT ENGLAND LOCAL DELIVERY PILOT   ST JAMES NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN ST JAMES NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN ST JAMES NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN   ST SIDWELL'S COMMUNITY CENTRE ST SIDWELL'S COMMUNITY CENTRE ST SIDWELL'S COMMUNITY CENTRE   ST SIDWELL'S POINT ST SIDWELL'S POINT ST SIDWELL'S POINT   STAGECOACH SOUTH WEST STAGECOACH SOUTH WEST STAGECOACH SOUTH WEST   STUDENT ACCOMMODATION STUDENT ACCOMMODATION STUDENT ACCOMMODATION   TEIGNBRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL TEIGNBRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL TEIGNBRIDGE DISTRICT COUNCIL   TRANSPORT POLICY TRANSPORT POLICY TRANSPORT POLICY   UNIVERSITY OF EXETER UNIVERSITY OF EXETER UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   WATER LANE WATER LANE WATER LANE  

More stories