NEWS

Victoria Street “co-living” complex refused as “substandard level of accommodation”

Council confirms scheme would constitute “overdevelopment” but persists in promoting co-living as local housing solution, claiming lack of demand means “no evidence to demonstrate that it is not a suitable model” for Exeter.

Leigh Curtis with Martin Redfern

Exeter City Council has refused an application to build a “co-living” complex in Victoria Street after it was revised to reduce the number of bedspaces from 101 to 89 but still deliver five times the recommended residential occupancy density for the area.

A report by a council planning officer says the scheme would have provided a “substandard level of accommodation”.

It adds that its “height, scale, positioning and massing” would not be “in keeping with the fine urban grain of the surrounding area” and would have “unacceptable amenity impacts” on its neighbours.

A council planning permission refusal notice says that the proposals contained “conflicting information on private spaces and access” and did not provide adequate internal or external amenity space for prospective residents.

It also says the scheme’s developer had failed to demonstrate that external lighting, combined with the removal of trees, would not cause significant harm to lesser horseshoe bats that pass along the railway cutting bordering the site’s south-eastern boundary.

The council said it had engaged with the applicant in a “positive and proactive way” and had “looked for solutions” to facilitate the development. However, it said the proposals remained contrary to a range of planning policies and should be refused.

Victoria Street co-living complex development proposal site Victoria Street co-living complex development proposal site. Image: Westworks.

Shopland Gray Developments applied to construct a 3,200m2 complex of three, four and five-storey blocks containing 101 bedspaces on the 0.59 acre site in Victoria Street in July last year.

The development would have entailed the demolition of an eight-bedroom Victorian villa and the adjacent Lions Holt vehicle repair garage previously occupied by Vanborn & Radford.

In January the city council told the developers that it was “unlikely to support the proposed scheme due to a number of concerns relating to its design and its likely impacts on adjacent residential properties”.

A revised scheme was then submitted for approval in March which included twelve fewer bedspaces. Other changes included reductions in the height of the scheme’s central and northern blocks alongside increases in the height of infill blocks on its south-eastern boundary.

This would have reduced the density of the development from 420 to 370 dwellings per hectare, which would still have been nearly five times the residential density recommended in the density study which forms part of the new Exeter local plan evidence base.

The developers claimed that the “redundant” brownfield site was of “limited value overall” and said that both south and north blocks would be “located on a brownfield area” despite their intended position on the gardens at the front and rear of the villa that comprise most of the site.

They also said that there is “a strong imperative within both the adopted and emerging development plan to optimising [sic] the use of brownfield sites in sustainable locations - such as is proposed in this instance - to bring forward new forms of housing such as co-living’.”

Victoria Street co-living complex revised development proposal view to North-West Victoria Street co-living complex revised development proposal view to North-West. Image: Westworks.

The council described the proposed scheme density as “overdevelopment” but did not connect its density with its substandard co-living design.

Instead it revisited claims by council development director Ian Collinson, made during a planning committee meeting that approved co-living developments at Summerland Street and Exeland House in January, that there was evidence that demonstrated a need for co-living development in Exeter.

No such evidence exists. The council report on the Victoria Street scheme cites a Local Housing Needs Assessment, now two years old, that also forms part of the new Exeter local plan evidence base.

It admits that this assessment, which only spends one of its 133 pages considering co-living, actually says only that this form of accommodation “may” address the combined impacts of the extraordinarily rapid rise in University of Exeter student numbers, increased demand for social housing, changes in the benefits system and rising private rents in the city.

It also acknowledges that this assessment found that single young person households are expected to decline significantly in Exeter over the next fifteen years, concluding that its “projections would envisage little role for this type of dwelling”.

Victoria Street co-living complex revised development proposal view to North-East Victoria Street co-living complex revised development proposal view to North-East. Image: Westworks.

The council officer’s report also admits that the Local Housing Needs Assessment concludes that “it is difficult to project a need for studio apartments or co-living schemes” and that the council’s “policy-led” approach risks “an over-supply of small dwellings which would exclude the ability of families to form in the area”.

However, instead of recognising that the council using its planning powers to artificially stimulate the supply of co-living does not demonstrate demand for its provision, the report goes on to say that the lack of demand actually means that there is “no evidence to demonstrate that it is not a suitable model” for Exeter.

It then quotes the housing needs assessment, which ignores Exeter’s low employment and graduate retention rates, to conclude – without evidence – that “the scale of the student numbers in Exeter would suggest that there is a market for post-student self-contained units”.


Democracy doesn't work when people don't know who is deciding what on whose behalf and what the costs and consequences of those decisions will be.

Exeter Observer is proving that reader-funded media can deliver the independent public interest journalism our local democracy needs.

Upgrade to a paid Exeter Observer subscription to support our work and get access to exclusive premium content and more.

More stories
Northbrook Swimming Pool campaign demonstration Exeter Guildhall 13 May 2025

Campaigners compel Exeter City Council to reconsider Northbrook pool closure with 2,250-strong resident petition

Pressure on council intensifies after freedom of information request responses confirm £3.5 million budget cuts included potentially unlawful decision to close swimming pool without public consultation or impact assessment.

Wild camping on Dartmoor

Supreme Court rejects Dartmoor landowners’ attempt to prevent wild camping on their land

Judges unanimously dismiss appeal by Alexander and Diana Darwall against 2023 ruling upholding Dartmoor Commons Act as campaigners call for enhanced public rights to access nature pledged by Labour when still in opposition.

Child on park bench

Ofsted finds Devon County Council children’s services remain “inadequate” with rating unchanged since 2020

Inspection report highlights “serious weaknesses” that are “leaving children at risk of harm” as failings echo poor Special Educational Needs & Disabilities provision.

Mid Devon District Council headquarters at Phoenix House in Tiverton

Mid Devon District Council mischarged 2,865 social housing tenants £15.5 million in rent over twenty years

Housing regulator identifies “serious failings” in application of rent standard as council discovers dozens of evictions in which “rent arrears were the sole, or contributory factor”.

Dartmoor wildfire on 5 May 2025, photo by Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service

Dartmoor National Park warns of continued high fire risk after wildfire destroys 1,230 acres of moorland

Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service took nearly 24 hours to extinguish bank holiday weekend blaze that followed warning of uncontrolled moorland fire risk.

Former Firezza in Sidwell Street to become adult gaming centre

24 hour year-round Sidwell Street “adult gaming centre” allowed at appeal

Planning inspector finds no evidence that “increase in crime and disorder” or “serious detrimental impacts on the health of local residents” would result from change of use from restaurant and takeaway unit.

On Our Radar
Exeter Respect Festival

SATURDAY 7 & SUNDAY 8 JUNE 2025

Exeter Respect Festival 2025

The annual celebration of Exeter diversity returns for its 28th anniversary with live music and performance, food stalls, community and campaign groups.

BELMONT PARK

Exeter City Of Literature literary map

SUNDAY 8 JUNE 2025

The Book Market 2025

Exeter City of Literature event features independent booksellers from across the county with author talks, stalls, food and drink.

CATHEDRAL GREEN

Exeter Custom House

SUNDAY 8 JUNE 2025

Heritage Harbour Festival 2025

The maritime-themed event returns for a third year with steam boats, exhibitions, talks, live music, film screenings and more.

EXETER QUAY

Art Week Exeter 2025 graphic

MONDAY 9 TO SUNDAY 15 JUNE 2025

Art Week Exeter 2025

Festival returns with exhibitions, film screenings, talks, workshops, performances, social events and an art car boot sale.

EXETER CITY CENTRE

Pipe organ keyboard in St Mary's Church, Throwleigh by Andrew Abbott

SATURDAY 14 JUNE 2025

Lost and Found (Keyboards Revoiced)

Exeter Contemporary Sounds and Ian Summers perform works on rescued, repurposed and reimagined instruments.

EXETER LIBRARY

Exeter Philharmonic Choir in Exeter Cathedral

SATURDAY 14 JUNE 2025

A Feast of English Choral Music

Exeter Philharmonic Choir performs works by English composers.

EXETER CATHEDRAL