FEATURES

101-bed “co-living” complex proposed in the heart of St James

Council vision for city’s future on collision course with neighbourhood plan policies in Victoria Street scheme described as “yet more student housing by stealth”.

Martin Redfern

Plans for a development of 101 studio bedspaces in a complex of three, four and five-storey blocks in the heart of St James have been submitted to the city council for approval.

Shopland Gray Developments is seeking full planning permission for a 3,200m2 “co-living” scheme designed by ECE Westworks on a 0.24 hectare (0.59 acre) site in Victoria Street.

The development would entail the demolition of an eight-bedroom Victorian villa and the adjacent Lions Holt vehicle repair garage previously occupied by Vanborn & Radford.

Three interconnected blocks with raised walkways and paved areas would then be constructed on the site of the garage, house and gardens.

Victoria Street co-living proposal development site Victoria Street co-living proposal development site

A design and access statement describes the scheme as “low rise, medium density housing” in an “exemplar development which enhances the local neighbourhood and improves the existing aesthetic”.

It adds that the “modesty of a more suitable design” has driven the development process to a “final design conclusion that respects the locality of the area” in the form of an “individualistic proposal with sensitivity to the surrounding context”.

It adds that the development would “positively contribute to the diverse typology of Victoria Street” while “paying homage to the historical vernacular in and around the area”.

Victoria Street co-living proposal illustrative view Victoria Street co-living proposal illustrative view

93 of the 101 self-contained studio bedspaces in the scheme, each of which would have its own kitchen and bathroom, would provide a total of 20m2 of living space, about the same as a typical single garage. Three units would provide 21m2, four more 25m2 and one unit 26m2.

None would meet national space standards, which require a one-person dwelling to provide at least 37m2 of space (39m2 if it has a bath instead of a shower).

Co-living developments are, however, often allowed to evade these standards by local planning authorities which choose to classify them as sui generis, a planning term for uses which are excluded from use classification by legislation.

The city council follows this approach. It said it would introduce a co-living policy three years ago, following other local authorities which have adopted planning policies to control such developments, but has yet to do so.

Victoria Street co-living development proposal courtyard view Victoria Street co-living proposal illustrations present a panopticon design

The Victoria Street application is nevertheless keen to classify the development site as “redundant brownfield”, a frame it repeats several times.

It correctly says the repair garage site, over which the central block would be built, requires further investigation to determine the contamination risks it presents.

However it also says that both south and north blocks would be “located on a brownfield area” despite their intended sites on the gardens at the front and rear of Wisteria House.

And it says that the “intention is to maintain much of the existing vegetation along the northern and eastern boundaries” but as the plans make clear this will all be cut down inside the site boundary.

It then cites the outline draft version of the new Exeter local plan in its support, on the basis that such “brownfield site” proposals are precisely the form of development the city council wants to encourage, and says that council officers support co-living development on the site too.

Wisteria House - part of Victoria Street co-living proposal development site Wisteria House, to be demolished as part of the Victoria Street co-living proposal development site

An accompanying planning statement says the scheme has been “the subject of extensive consultation prior to it being finalised”.

It also says leaflets intended to inform local residents about the proposals were only “posted to the 50 properties in the immediate vicinity of the site” and that the applicants have only engaged with “key stakeholders” other than city council officers twice in more than two years.

This apparently amounted to meeting ward councillor Martin Pearce in November last year and holding a video call with Exeter St James Community Trust representatives the following month.

In its previous configuration as the St James neighbourhood forum, the trust was responsible for the St James Neighbourhood Plan, which has been in force as part of Exeter’s statutory development plan for more than a decade.

The trust’s emphatic opposition to the proposals is clear. It says they are “completely at odds with the community’s vision for a sustainable community and the overarching aim of the neighbourhood plan to restore community balance through planning decisions that tilt away from the current and worsening dominance by one demographic group”.

St James Neighbourhood Plan, policy C2

Large scale purpose built student accommodation will be permitted in areas where it can be properly integrated into the urban area. This means locations:

a) that are not predominantly characterised by intact streets of traditional terraced, semi-detached and detached forms of 2-3 storey residential development;

b) where the servicing and parking requirements could be achieved with no unacceptable impact on the amenity of the adjacent area for residents;

c) where the scale and massing of any purpose built accommodation proposed would be broadly similar to that of surrounding buildings.

Source: St James Neighbourhood Plan

The Victoria Street application does acknowledge the St James Neighbourhood Plan, but it simply asserts compliance with the plan’s provisions and doesn’t mention policy C2, which addresses large scale purpose built student accommodation of the type it proposes.

This omission appears to rely on the applicant’s conceit that simply calling the development “co-living” will make it so, even though students would be free to live there and its form is indistinguishable from the purpose built student accommodation to which the policy applies.

The design and access statement also includes three site location maps which seek to show that it is in “an ideal location for the proposed use”.

These identify several nearby points of interest but not the location of the university’s’ campuses despite both being clearly visible on all three.

Victoria Street co-living proposal development site location map showing related points of interest Victoria Street co-living proposal development site location map with nearby points of interest. Contains satellite imagery © 2022 CNES/Airbus, Getmapping plc, Infoterra Ltd & Bluesky, Maxar Technologies.

A design statement “analysis” also seeks to justify the development proposals by comparing them with “precedent examples of co-living in Exeter”.

Only one of these schemes is being constructed while work has yet to begin on another despite being approved nearly four years ago then revised two years later.

A third has still to be scheduled for determination after falling foul of flood risks.

Even though the first Exeter co-living unit has yet to be let, the Victoria Street application says it would “provide a form of housing for which there is a clear and growing need”, saying that co-living is a “much-needed form of development”.

It also says that two of the three Exeter co-living schemes will be occupied at a rate between 1.65 and 2 residents per room without explaining why its figures for Victoria Street are based on only one resident renting each studio.

Precedent examples of co-living in Exeter included in Victoria Street co-living proposal “Precedent examples of co-living in Exeter” included in Victoria Street co-living proposal

While there is no evidence of demand for co-living in Exeter, there is substantial evidence of demand for student accommodation. Students based at the university’s Exeter campuses amounted to nearly 30% of the city’s population in 2021-22.

The only Exeter co-living scheme that is actually being built is located opposite the university’s St Luke’s campus, with room rates that are expected to be well out of reach of local workers.

We will not know whether its tenants are all students until construction is complete, but few expect any not to be. Public comments on the Victoria Street proposals show that residents anticipate the same outcome in St James.

Robert Blakey says the development is “clearly intended as (even more) student accommodation” and adds that the site should instead “obviously be used to provide decent smaller-scale social housing”.

Linda Jessep describes the development as “yet more student housing by stealth”, a theme reflected in several responses, while Caroline Lee is also unconvinced, saying: “I do not like being lied to by property developers. Throw this out – it is an absolute sham.”

Subscribe to The Exeter Digest - Exeter Observer's essential free email newsletter

Your personal information will be processed and stored in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Joseph Fitzpatrick says: “Yet another detrimental planning application with no regard for the local community or the hard work put in to rebuild the sense of community stripped away by historic planning errors.”.

Annemarie MacDonald adds: “St James is already under strain and this will only put more pressure on the ward.”

As the St James Community Trust points out, Exeter should expect many more student accommodation blocks masquerading as co-living developments like the Victoria Street proposals.

The new Community Infrastructure Levy charges being introduced by the city council are designed to encourage this form of development whether they end up occupied by students or not.


Exeter City Council is inviting comments on the Victoria Street co-living development plans until 17 September.


Democracy doesn't work when people don't know who is deciding what on whose behalf and what the costs and consequences of those decisions will be.

Exeter Observer is proving that reader-funded media can deliver the independent public interest journalism our local democracy needs.

Upgrade to a paid Exeter Observer subscription to support our work and get access to exclusive premium content and more.

More stories
Devon & Torbay Combined County Authority draft local growth plan infographic

Devon & Torbay CCA keeps quiet about 2025-35 Local Growth Plan as it takes charge of regional development agenda

Combined County Authority privately selects unspecified stakeholders to co-author document setting out strategic priorities but with little of substance to say on addressing region’s structural challenges.

Northbrook pool

Exeter City Council fields false prospectus in determination to close Northbrook pool

Ian Collinson reports double down on misrepresentation, material omission and flat denial as council plans to rend more of city’s fabric from its roots.

Clifton Hill sports centre redevelopment site

Second undervalue sale of Clifton Hill sports centre site after buyback loss leaves city with £3m less than initial market value

Council sold land for £2.14m – at £2.11m discount – then bought it back for £3.037m before selling again for £3.375m at £425,000 discount with £225,000 sweetener after also agreeing to spend net £600,000 on preparation, marketing and disposal costs.

Mary Arches car parks redevelopment site aerial view

300-bed “co-living” blocks to trump social housing vision for Mary Arches car parks

More people could be crammed into Eutopia Homes complex than current car parking spaces after Exeter City Council commits to “homes for the people of Exeter” on Liveable Exeter North Gate site.

Exeter Public Spaces Protection Order boundary map

Exeter City Council renews Public Spaces Protection Order for three more years

Measure introduced to curb anti-social behaviour in 2017 extended to 2028 following consultation limited to selected consultees.

Eutopia Homes Exmouth Junction build to rent development rear elevation

First Exeter build to rent flats marketed at £1,375-£2,350 per month with “affordable” units costing £1,080-£1,800 plus bills

Eutopia Homes rents in Exmouth Junction block would leave many workers with substantially lower income than Joseph Rowntree Foundation minimum for a socially-acceptable standard of living.

On Our Radar
St Sidwell's Community Centre supper dish

SATURDAY 28 JUNE 2025

Sid’s Summer Supper Fundraiser

Community centre hosts locally-sourced seasonal three-course meal to help improve café facilities.

ST SIDWELL'S COMMUNITY CENTRE

Signals of the Sea in rehearsal

SUNDAY 6 JULY 2025

Signals of the Sea

Theatre Alibi hosts a Paddleboat Theatre production that follows a lighthouse keeper as he uncovers the secrets of the sea.

EMMANUEL HALL

Illustration of Hansel and Gretel by Arthur Rackham

SATURDAY 12 JULY 2025

Fairy Tales in Opera and Piano Music

A fairy tale-themed concert for children and their families.

ST NICHOLAS PRIORY