COMMENT

Labour councillors again appointed to all thirteen committee chairs at annual council meeting

Council leader finally quits planning committee alongside other remaining Executive member but persists with secret board that enables scrutiny evasion.

Martin Redfern

Exeter Labour’s vote share fell 1.5% in this year’s local elections but it won five fewer seats than last year, apparently because the Liberal Democrats and Greens finessed their electoral strategies to address the failings of the First Past the Post electoral system to which Labour’s national leadership still clings.

Because the party only had to win two Exeter wards to retain overall control of the city council, its net retention of seven seats at these elections leaves council leader Phil Bialyk in control of a majority block of 25 votes among 39 council seats, as last year.

So when appointments to the council’s committees for the coming year were made at Tuesday’s annual council meeting, alongside the appointment of the Lord Mayor and his deputy, there was no surprise that Labour councillors were again appointed to all thirteen committee chairs.

Nor has much changed on the council’s ostensibly decision-making Executive committee. Bob Foale has replaced Amal Ghusain, who left the council after a single term, and Duncan Wood has been sent back to leisure services, switching with Josie Parkhouse who takes over responsibility for the council’s climate crisis response.

Apart from some minor portfolio alterations, the rest of the Executive stays put.

Exeter City Council annual meeting Exeter City Council annual meeting

More significant changes have taken place elsewhere. The council’s Governance Review Board has been unceremoniously scrapped: prematurely as it has yet to report the outcome of its work over the past year and worryingly considering the council’s governance woes.

At the same time Phil Bialyk has quit the planning committee, and removed Emma Morse from it too, after failing to follow Local Government Association guidance that neither should sit on it for several years.

Exeter Observer first challenged the council on its approach to planning committee appointments in 2020 when, extraordinarily, eight Executive members occupied nearly two-thirds of its seats.

We did so again after last year’s local elections when he moved six of the Executive members elsewhere but retained his seat and kept Emma Morse in the chair, then again last month, when he openly admitted he was choosing to ignore the guidance.

The following week he led the charge against an application to develop a site just 160 yards from his house from his seat on the committee before apparently, finally, seeing the light. We applaud the eventual decision, but not the facility with which it was made.

Exeter City Council 2023-24 committee appointments and portfolio holder briefs Exeter City Council 2023-24 committee appointments and portfolio holder briefs

Unfortunately the council leader’s approach to scrutiny hasn’t kept even this pace.

Instead of opposition councillors chairing the council’s key scrutiny committees, as at other local authorities such as Devon County Council, councillors from his own party occupy these seats. Matt Vizard will continue in one while Yvonne Atkinson will take the other, raising eyebrows all round.

These committees are charged with protecting the council from Executive overreach by providing a crucial check and balance on its actions: they are much less likely to fulfil this function effectively when led by members of the same political party as the people they are supposed to be holding to account.

Worse, the council’s secret Scrutiny Programme Board, which fundamentally thwarts the purpose of local authority scrutiny, continues to meet this year, allowing council directors and Executive members to interfere in scrutiny decision-making in which they should take no part.

The board will be chaired this year by Naima Allcock with a built-in Labour majority provided by Matt Vizard and Yvonne Atkinson.

Subscribe to The Exeter Digest - Exeter Observer's essential free email newsletter

Your personal information will be processed and stored in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Since it first met in 2019 it has enabled senior officers and the council’s chief executive to direct, defer and avoid scrutiny of the council’s climate crisis response, its relationships with companies such as Exeter City Living and major schemes such as St Sidwell’s Point, among other things.

The council’s chief executive even attended to present details of his own proposals for scrutiny of Exeter Development Fund, a financing scheme intended to expose council property assets to private investors that was being promoted by a company of which he was also CEO at the time.

They spelled out who would be invited as witnesses, what they would talk about and what the outcome of the scrutiny sessions would be.

This board has also enabled the council leader, the Executive committee and individual portfolio holders to direct scarce council scrutiny resources towards maintaining the status quo, prioritising issues that do not require the interrogation and deliberation that scrutiny is intended to involve and so preventing their use for this purpose.

This is how the Standing Overview Group that should have been created nearly a year ago after scrutiny councillors voted to inaugurate it to examine the city-wide response to climate change has not yet met, but Executive member Duncan Wood’s Plant-Based Task & Finish Group met four times within a few weeks of being proposed despite its unquantifiably small impact.

This approach to scrutiny could not be more different to the model proposed by the council’s external auditor – the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee – before which witnesses called to give evidence fear to appear.

The key characteristics of this committee, according to the auditor? That “it is chaired by a member of the official opposition and its members, of all political parties, are required to demonstrate robust challenge”.


Democracy doesn't work when people don't know who is deciding what on whose behalf and what the costs and consequences of those decisions will be.

Exeter Observer is proving that reader-funded media can deliver the independent public interest journalism our local democracy needs.

Upgrade to a paid Exeter Observer subscription to support our work and get access to exclusive premium content and more.

More stories
Northbrook swimming pool

City council holds sham Northbrook swimming pool closure consultation

£600,000 Exeter Leisure services budget cut signed off two weeks before pool consultation opened as St Sidwell’s Point drains other council leisure sites.

Met Office building at Exeter Science Park

Met Office to sell Exeter Science Park supercomputer and office buildings

Disposal motivated by replacement of nine year-old supercomputer with £1.2 billion government-funded off-site Microsoft facility.

St Petrock's outreach workers with a rough sleeper

Annual city council rough sleeper count “consistently underestimates” extent of Exeter rough sleeping

Homelessness charity St Petrock’s calls on council to change count methodology which identifies fewer rough sleepers than those known by outreach workers and reflected in government figures.

Devon County Council budget meeting 20 February 2025

Devon County Council reveals perilous financial state with SEND spending having “significant impact” on cash balances

5.9% budget increase for 2025-26 conceals £22 million cuts and £66 million cost increases with “inevitable” impact on “vital” services.

Grace Road Fields March 2025

Exeter Energy insists Riverside Valley Park only viable heat plant site but fails to explain Marsh Barton brownfield rejection

Company admits River Exe water source connection merely “potential” after 2036, incinerator connection only “possible” after 2030 and solar array “will not” meet plant electricity demand while statutory objections challenge Grace Road Fields plans.

Exeter Community Lottery revenue distribution FAQ

Exeter Community Lottery income spent on gambling licence fees and costs despite council marketing and point of sale claims

Materially misleading claims that 60% of ticket sales revenue goes to good causes repeatedly made on lottery website and in official council communications as Australian multinational profits from local voluntary and community sector support.

On Our Radar
Titus Andronicus by Nicholas Rowe

THURSDAY 3 APRIL 2025

Titus Andronicus

Lightbear Lane hosts a reading of Shakespeare’s bloody revenge tale.

ST NICHOLAS PRIORY

Jess Hughes Cameron and Chin See at 2024 Topsham Music Festival

FRIDAY 25 TO SUNDAY 27 APRIL 2025

2025 Topsham Music Festival

Three day event features jazz, percussion and classical music played by young professional musicians from across the country.

TOPSHAM

Edward Tripp

TUESDAY 29 APRIL 2025

City Slam 2025

Exeter City of Literature, Taking the Mic and Spork! co-host a third city-wide spoken-word poetry competition.

EXETER PHOENIX