FEATURES

Exeter City Council executive members take direct control of city planning decisions

Council’s executive now possesses majority on city planning committee, with council leader and planning portfolio holder also included despite national guidance, offering basis to challenge decisions and increasing democratic deficit.

Peter Cleasby

The number of executive members on Exeter City Council’s planning committee has more than doubled since April 2016 to give the executive a built-in near two-thirds majority on planning policy and development decisions affecting the city.

No other planning authority in the south west peninsula follows this practice, where the highest proportion of executive members on other planning committees is only one third, and six local authorities have no executive members on their planning committees at all.

The Exeter City Council leader and the portfolio holder for city planning and development also sit on the committee, although doing so is contrary to national guidance from the Local Government Association Planning Advisory Service.

St Sidwell's Point development site after demolition St Sidwell’s Point development site after demolition

It is a fundamental principle of the planning system in England that those who decide applications for development - whether for a garage extension or a major shopping centre - do so in accordance with planning law, national and local planning policies and the ethical standards expected of public office holders.

Most applications are decided by councillors or officers in local planning authorities, of which Exeter City Council is one.

The Planning Advisory Service, part of the Local Government Association and funded by central government, has been issuing guidance since 1992 on the legal and ethical considerations to be borne in mind by councillors when determining planning applications.

The latest edition, issued in December 2019, aims to ensure that “decisions on plan making and planning applications are undertaken, on behalf of communities, in a fair, impartial and transparent way”.

St Sidwell's Point development under construction St Sidwell’s Point development under construction

The Planning Advisory Service guidance says planning committee members “need to avoid any appearance of bias or having ‘predetermined’ views when making a decision on a planning application or policy”.

Predetermination involves a councillor entering a decision-making meeting with a closed mind either in favour of or against a specific planning application.

The guidance is unequivocal: “Avoiding predetermination and the impression of it is essential. The decision making process must be seen to be fair and impartial from the perspective of an external observer.

“If a decision maker has predetermined their position, they should withdraw from being a member of the decision making body for that matter.”

Planning decisions suspected of predetermination may be vulnerable to challenge by judicial review.

Bampfylde Street student accommodation blocks Bampfylde Street student accommodation blocks

The Planning Advisory Service guidance also focusses on ‘predisposition’, where a planning committee member “may have a pre-existing opinion or attitude about the matter under discussion, but remains open to listening to all the arguments and changing their mind in light of the information presented at the meeting”.

It contains specific advice on the composition of planning committees intended to minimise the risks of predetermination, predisposition and other conflicts of interest:

“Local planning authorities will usually have a cabinet or executive member responsible for development and planning (sometimes known as the portfolio holder).

“Planning Advisory Service advise[s] that the leader and portfolio holder of a local authority, who play an important role driving planning policies and proposals, should normally exclude themselves from decision making committees.”

In Exeter, not only are the council leader and planning portfolio holder members of the planning committee, so are six other members of the executive.

With a total committee membership of thirteen, this arrangement gives the executive a built-in majority on planning decisions.

Mary Arches Street construction site Mary Arches Street construction site

This has not happened by accident. In the month before the May 2016 council elections only three members of the executive sat on the planning committee. By June the committee had five executive members.

This was increased to six the following year and by June this year the number was seven, giving the executive its majority. The eighth was added in August, replacing committee chair Councillor Rachel Lyons who is not a member of the executive.

Last month Exeter Observer surveyed all other local planning authorities in Devon, Cornwall and Somerset. Six had no executive members on their planning committees at all, including Cornwall Council, Torbay Council and Plymouth City Council.

Of the rest, the proportion of executive members on the planning committee ranged from 8% to 33%. The proportion in Exeter is 62%.

We asked the city council’s press office for a statement explaining why the council was so out of line with its peers. After five weeks and with apologies for the delay, a press officer said:

“It is a matter for the leaders of the various political groups represented on the council to identify members of their groups for membership of all committees, including the planning committee, in accordance with the statutory requirement for political proportionality.

“The leader of the council therefore identified the relevant number of members from his group to sit on the planning committee.”

However this did not answer the question we asked, since political proportionality - the balance of councillors by party on the full council - is not at issue: Labour are entitled to ten of the thirteen planning committee seats.

In view of this we asked the council to reconsider its statement, but a spokesperson said there was nothing to add.

Pinhoe construction site Pinhoe construction site

We then asked council leader Phil Bialyk to comment. He responded with admirable alacrity, saying he was not sure what our concern was and stressing that members were appointed to the planning committee in line with the political proportionality rules.

We tried again with Councillor Bialyk, explaining that the number of Labour members on the committee was not at issue, and that what we were seeking was an explanation for the high number of members of the council’s executive on the planning committee.

We asked for an explanation of the council’s divergence from national guidance and the practice of neighbouring councils, and how he would answer the charge that Exeter City Council under his leadership “has stacked the membership of the planning committee to ensure that applications backed by the executive will inevitably be approved”.

He replied by saying he had nothing to add to his previous response.

Monkerton construction site Monkerton construction site

This is not an academic debate. Exeter City Council has embarked on a programme of major projects overseen by the unelected and unaccountable Liveable Exeter Place Board.

These include the construction of 12,000 new homes, the reconfiguration of the city in pursuit of carbon neutrality and the development of new sports and leisure facilities and transport infrastructure.

Much of this will involve the city council and its partners submitting applications for development, change of use of existing buildings and land and other matters controlled by the planning system.

Subscribe to The Exeter Digest - Exeter Observer's essential free email newsletter

Your personal information will be processed and stored in accordance with our Privacy Policy

The council’s own code of conduct for local planning (part 5j of the council’s constitution says: “Applications submitted by the city council and members or officers employed by the city council can give rise to a suspicion of impropriety by the public.

“This relates to both planning applications and development plan proposals.

“It is essential that they are handled in a way that gives no grounds for preferential treatment.”

The inclusion of the council leader and the city planning and development portfolio holder on the planning committee and the executive committee’s built-in majority on that committee create unnecessary risk by increasing opportunities to challenge planning decisions on procedural grounds.

Like cuts to council decision-making scrutiny, outsourcing carbon reduction policy to Exeter City Futures and allowing Liveable Exeter Place Board to decide parts of the city’s corporate plan, they also say more about the council’s intention to promote its agenda than its stated aspiration to be “a model of strong local democracy”.


Democracy doesn't work when people don't know who is deciding what on whose behalf and what the costs and consequences of those decisions will be.

Exeter Observer is proving that reader-funded media can deliver the independent public interest journalism our local democracy needs.

Upgrade to a paid Exeter Observer subscription to support our work and get access to exclusive premium content and more.

More stories
Save Northbrook Pool campaigners dressed in black outside Exeter City Council's offices on 24 June 2025

Labour councillors dive deeper into denial in decision to abandon Northbrook pool

Exeter residents mourn as council suppresses destructive consequences of creating St Sidwell’s Point complex that looms in leisure service shadows like a leviathan.

Devon & Torbay Combined County Authority draft local growth plan infographic

Devon & Torbay CCA keeps quiet about 2025-35 Local Growth Plan as it takes charge of regional development agenda

Combined County Authority privately selects unspecified stakeholders to co-author document setting out strategic priorities but with little of substance to say on addressing region’s structural challenges.

Northbrook pool

Exeter City Council fields false prospectus in determination to close Northbrook pool

Ian Collinson reports double down on misrepresentation, material omission and flat denial as council plans to rend more of city’s fabric from its roots.

Clifton Hill sports centre redevelopment site

Second undervalue sale of Clifton Hill sports centre site after buyback loss leaves city with £3m less than initial market value

Council sold land for £2.14m – at £2.11m discount – then bought it back for £3.037m before selling again for £3.375m at £425,000 discount with £225,000 sweetener after also agreeing to spend net £600,000 on preparation, marketing and disposal costs.

Mary Arches car parks redevelopment site aerial view

300-bed “co-living” blocks to trump social housing vision for Mary Arches car parks

More people could be crammed into Eutopia Homes complex than current car parking spaces after Exeter City Council commits to “homes for the people of Exeter” on Liveable Exeter North Gate site.

Exeter Public Spaces Protection Order boundary map

Exeter City Council renews Public Spaces Protection Order for three more years

Measure introduced to curb anti-social behaviour in 2017 extended to 2028 following consultation limited to selected consultees.

On Our Radar
Illustration of Hansel and Gretel by Arthur Rackham

SATURDAY 12 JULY 2025

Fairy Tales in Opera and Piano Music

A fairy tale-themed concert for children and their families.

ST NICHOLAS PRIORY

St Thomas churchyard

SATURDAY 19 JULY 2025

Love St Thomas Summer Festival

New community event launches with live music, talks, workshops, stalls, refreshments and family-friendly activities.

ST THOMAS CHURCHYARD

Summer at the Quayside illustration

TUESDAY 29 JULY TO FRIDAY 29 AUGUST 2025

Summer at the Quayside

A month of free family activities including weaving, felting, doodling and drumming.

EXETER QUAY