Everything else is public relations  Upgrade to paid

FEATURES

Exeter City Futures falsely claims development fund documents disclosed under FOI legislation

Senior council director puts company on collision course with Information Commissioner’s Office as significant governance failings emerge after councillors and public kept in dark over Liveable Exeter financing scheme proposals.

Martin Redfern

Exeter City Futures has falsely claimed that it previously disclosed documents related to Exeter Development Fund after the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) imposed a deadline for its response to Exeter Observer information requests.

Jo Yelland, an Exeter City Council director who has worked for the company three days a week since January, responded to the ICO’s deadline by claiming that information requested by Exeter Observer under freedom of information legislation was provided during face-to-face meetings with Exeter City Futures staff.

No such meetings were held. Instead, two telephone conversations took place with company staff during which neither disclosed any of the requested information.

The requests, which were made in January under the Environmental Information Regulations, were for details of meetings and unpublished documents related to Exeter Development Fund, a private debt-driven Liveable Exeter property development financing scheme that Exeter City Futures has been working on since 2017.

The fund came under fire from councillors in July who say it is based on insufficiently-evidenced assumptions and won’t meet Exeter’s housing needs.

Unpublished Exeter Development Fund documents

  • community engagement model and community challenge plan
  • stakeholder meetings, sessions and workshops schedule
  • project stakeholder engagement summary
  • financial modelling assumptions and feasibility study
  • JLL development assumptions report
  • Liveable Exeter site development viability appraisals
  • LDA Design site development schedules
  • asset transfer frameworks
  • detailed risk register
  • benefits methodology
  • benefits register

We made the information requests after the publication of a truncated version of the outline business case for the fund for discussion at a council meeting in January.

This document, which was marked as a draft despite having been signed off the previous August then clumsily edited to disguise its age, was only shared with councillors after meetings with senior council staff in which Exeter Observer applied pressure to disclose the details of the scheme.

We were concerned that councillors and the public had been kept in the dark because of the risks the fund presents to publicly-owned land and property assets, the sale of which it proposes to raise private finance to build thousands of rented flats.

Despite then-council leader Pete Edwards committing to the fund nearly five years ago, it has not been mentioned in any of Labour’s local election manifestos since, and current council leader Phil Bialyk said “it was too early in the process to bring forward any detail” when asked about it by Green Party councillor Diana Moore at a meeting on 18 October last year.

Exeter Development Fund workshop agenda October 2021 October 2021 Exeter Development Fund workshop agenda, not supplied by Exeter City Futures

However a Liveable Exeter Place Board meeting that the council had repurposed as a “deep dive on the proposed fund” to “establish a common understanding on the work that is being done”, to which board members and their finance directors and estates managers were invited, had already taken place.

The council’s invitation to attend the three-hour workshop “devoted to this single issue” included a copy of the same truncated version of the outline business case for the fund, minus clumsy edits and marked as version 1.0, that was presented to councillors for the first time, as a draft, the following January.

The minutes of this meeting are among the information we requested.

A longer version of the outline business case for the fund was subsequently published by Global City Futures, Exeter City Futures’ parent company, in May – but this does not contain the information we requested either.

In July we made a formal complaint to the ICO about Exeter City Futures’ failure to meet its statutory obligations. In October the ICO notified the company that it was a public authority under the Environmental Information Regulations, and so subject to their provisions, and gave it ten working days to respond to our information requests.

The company’s response was to falsely claim it had provided the information nine months before, putting it on course for a collision with the Information Commissioner’s Office in the new year.

Exeter Development Fund workshop presentation October 2021 October 2021 Exeter Development Fund workshop presentation, not supplied by Exeter City Futures

Exeter City Futures’ obligations under the Environmental Information Regulations include routinely and proactively publishing a wide range of information.

This includes any “policies, plans and procedures relating to the environment” as well as “facts and analyses of facts that are relevant and important to major environmental policy proposals” such as Exeter Development Fund and its discredited Net Zero Exeter plan.

The company also says its board is “committed to being completely transparent and open about the things that are discussed”.

But when it published the minutes of its August meeting – at the end of September – they referred to but did not include an accompanying report which “identified areas of weakness in relation to governance” that needed “immediate attention”.

When we asked for the unpublished report it appeared on the company website a week later as if it had been there all along.

Exeter City Futures declared public funding to the end of 2022.
Sources: Exeter City Council, Exeter City Futures.

Among other issues, the report found that there was “no formal procurement or other arrangement in place between Exeter City Futures and Global City Futures for work Global City Futures, as a commercial consultancy, may undertake on behalf of Exeter City Futures partners”.

These partners include Exeter City Council, the University of Exeter, Exeter College and the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust – it is now more than a year since there has been a Devon County Council board member – and this work includes Exeter Development Fund, for which the council transferred £38,000 to the company during the 2012-22 financial year alone.

In addition, despite Exeter City Futures’ board agreeing that Global City Futures staff could “work on joint contracts with Exeter City Futures to avoid the need for Exeter City Futures to pay VAT on work undertaken by Global City Futures on Exeter Development Fund”, the report found that “there were no delegated powers in place to allow any officer to actually sign joint contracts”.

It said that there was “no real demarcation about who is the actual employer” and added that as the motivation for the arrangement “appeared to be VAT avoidance” it “could lead to reputational risks for Exeter City Futures board members”.

If the company’s board has met to assess progress on addressing these risks we wouldn’t know: no records of any meetings have since been published.

Subscribe to The Exeter Digest - Exeter Observer's essential free email newsletter

Your personal information will be processed and stored in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Meanwhile Exeter City Futures’ inability to deliver Exeter’s 2030 net zero policy is finally becoming apparent to council members and officers, three years after passing it, even though the greenhouse gas inventory it commissioned from the University of Exeter misrepresents the scale of the city’s emissions.

In September council climate change portfolio holder Duncan Wood admitted that Exeter City Futures had “limited resources to explore opportunities and drive the collaboration between stakeholders and residents to make the range of significant changes needed” and that the company’s approach to decarbonisation had “not been built on a credible budget and delivery plan”.

Last month council CEO Karime Hassan, who also began working at Exeter City Futures in January alongside Jo Yelland, acknowledged that Exeter City Futures has neither the “funding or legal powers to effect change”.

However he also said that Exeter City Futures is now “taking the time to look at what needs to be done now to hit 2030 targets for Exeter” by holding yet another series of workshops, echoing his July proposal to “invite” the company “to reflect on the challenges of resourcing the step change in activity to meet the net zero 2030 goal and to suggest options for meeting these challenges”.

This is not the sort of circular economy the city needs to tackle the climate crisis – Exeter City Futures has been responsible for city decarbonisation since July 2019.

As his and Jo Yelland’s £125,000 secondment to the company comes to an end he has an opportunity during his last days in the job to address its persistent evasion of scrutiny. He could commit the company to routine, proactive publication of the environmental information it holds and release the information we requested back in January for all to see.

As with the unelected and unaccountable Liveable Exeter Place Board, which meets in private without publishing its proceedings and for which he is also responsible, the council should not facilitate the development of major policy proposals with the potential to affect everyone who lives and works in Exeter without telling them what it is up to.

Everything else is public relations

Exeter Observer is owned and funded by its readers instead of remote shareholders or individuals beholden to advertisers or those in power.

This means we are free to focus on local news that matters instead of reproducing content marketing, press releases or public relations spin.

It is our paying subscribers who enable us to cover stories that the people and organisations we scrutinise would rather you did not see.

We need more of our readers to contribute to our running costs so we can keep publishing our independent investigative journalism.

133 of the 300 paying subscribers we need to break even have signed up so far.

Please help us reach our goal by joining them today from less than £2/week.

Upgrade to paid

More stories
Grace Road Fields in March

Botched consultation restarted on sale of 8.5 acres of Riverside Valley Park green space

Council land disposal to include rights to lay underground distribution pipework across River Exe floodplain following “low-to-zero carbon” Grace Road Fields heat plant planning approval in face of Environment Agency sequential test concerns.

September 2025 permitted replacement scheme west elevation

Council denies data and contrives criteria to dismiss community balance concerns in third King Billy student block approval

Exeter Observer analysis finds more students living in city centre than residents as council bid to include PBSA in housing delivery figures weakens local planning policy – but does not remove it from decision-making altogether.

Exeter College and Petroc campuses map

Exeter College and Petroc merger set to create largest college group in South West

Colleges hold public consultation on creation of new organisation which they say would educate 16,000 students at Exeter and North Devon campuses and employ 2,000 staff with £100 million turnover.

Proposed Clarendon House student block aerial view

Proposals to replace Clarendon House with 297-bed student accommodation complex submitted for approval

Developer Zinc Real Estate arrives at final proposal for up to ten storey Paris Street roundabout redevelopment after nearly two years of informal public consultations and meetings with city councillors and officers.

Nadder Park Road application site location map

Barley Lane greenfield plans place persistent threat to Exeter’s north and north-west hills in spotlight

Council inability to identify sufficient land to meet government housing delivery targets leaves residents with faint hope of local plan policies preventing Nadder Park Road ridgeline development despite 175 public objections to scheme.

On Our Radar
Two Moors Festival musicians performing

WEDNESDAY 1 TO SUNDAY 12 OCTOBER 2025

Two Moors Festival

Chamber music festival celebrates 25th anniversary with performances, talks and workshops across fifteen venues.

DARTMOOR, EXMOOR & SURROUNDS

Play Interact Explore installation

SATURDAY 4 OCTOBER TO SUNDAY 2 NOVEMBER 2025

Play Interact Explore

Theatre Alibi hosts an interactive exhibition suitable for all ages created by artists Leap then Look.

EMMANUEL HALL

Still from How the Little Mole Got His Trousers

SATURDAY 18 OCTOBER 2025

Nature’s Resources

A programme of six short animated films explores the relationship between humans and non-human species.

EXETER PHOENIX