FEATURES

Is the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan GESPing for air?

The Greater Exeter Strategic Plan has been a long time in gestation. When it finally arrives, will it deliver?

Peter Cleasby

In summer 2016, four district councils authorised work to start on producing a new statutory planning document, the Greater Exeter Strategic Plan (GESP).

This aims to set out the overall spatial strategy and levels of housing and employment land required up to 2040 for the East Devon, Exeter, Mid Devon and Teignbridge council areas (excluding Dartmoor National Park). Devon County Council is also a partner, primarily because of its role as the transport, highways, and minerals and waste planning authority.

The original timetable, described by planners as “ambitious”, envisaged the plan would pass through all its consultation and examination phases to be in place by the end of 2019. Now, eight months from that deadline, not even the first draft has appeared.

During the first quarter of 2017 the GESP team consulted the public on the high-level issues to be addressed in the plan, and on a draft Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) which set out how the plan-makers should engage with communities.

A summary of responses received on the issues paper has been published, but there has been no response to comments on the SCI, and now, two years after the public process began, the SCI remains in draft. Public consultation on a first draft of the plan was initially scheduled for January 2018.

The whole idea of GESP was that the participating councils’ local plans would be guided by GESP decisions. The slipping timetable has caused particular difficulties for Exeter, whose local plan does not demonstrate a five year supply of land for housing – a requirement of the government’s National Planning Policy Framework - and is thus highly vulnerable to challenge by developers who want to build what they like where they like.

Local plans: a quick explanation

All district councils are required to produce a Development Plan to guide future development in the area.

Guidance issued under the Labour government pre-2010 specified the documents to make up these plans, including a Core Strategy and a Development Delivery Plan. Since the introduction of the first National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in 2012, these requirements have been loosened, but some councils – including Exeter – began their current plans under the pre-NPPF arrangements. This accounts for the use in Exeter planning documentation of terms no longer current, including:

  • Local Development Scheme: broadly, a list of the documents making up the Development Plan.
  • Core Strategy: provides a broad strategy for development, a spatial strategy (determines overall land use), strategic policies and strategic allocations (e.g. for housing).
  • Development Delivery Plan: allocates sites for development, designates sites for protection, and sets out development management policies to assist in determining individual planning applications.

Government policy encourages councils to collaborate in resolving strategic issues across boundaries by working on joint plans – the GESP is an example.

All plans are required to be subject to local consultation in draft form, and then submitted for approval by a government planning inspector. This process normally takes about three years.

The five year housing land supply requirement is set out in paragraph 73 of the NPPF 2019. Its purpose is to demonstrate a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide five years’ worth of housing against a housing requirement set out in adopted strategic policies, or against a local housing need figure.

Indeed, one view of the real purpose of GESP is to dig Exeter City Council out of its hole by moving some of the city’s prescribed housing requirements into other parts of Greater Exeter.

This is borne out by a report to the city council’s Executive on 10 July 2018 which stated: “However, there are elements of the Development Delivery Plan which need to follow on from the GESP, in particular the number and broad distribution of new homes and some other forms of development will be a GESP strategic decision.”

The same report ensured that Exeter City Council revised their timetable for producing a revised local plan that satisfied national policy requirements, following the GESP delays.

Councillors were no doubt influenced by a warning from the council’s monitoring officer who told them: “Exeter City Council’s core strategy which contains its housing allocation targets for the period up to 2026 is vulnerable to challenge and will become increasingly so challengeable until such time as both Exeter Development Delivery Plan and Greater Exeter Strategic Plan have finally been adopted.

“Given that care should be given to ensure that no further slippage occurs. There could be reputational damage to the Council in terms of transparency and accountability if the scheme is not updated.”

Subscribe to The Exeter Digest - Exeter Observer's essential free email newsletter

Your personal information will be processed and stored in accordance with our Privacy Policy

The reasons for the delay to GESP were cited as:

  • uncertainty in the light of the government’s reviews of national planning policy and housing policy
  • a very high response to the call for development sites issued in early 2017
  • difficulties in resolving transport issues with Devon County Council and Highways England.

In September 2018 the GESP team asked the participating councils to approve a high-level vision – not a draft plan - for public consultation. East Devon District Council gave it short shrift on grounds of vagueness and inadequacy. The document has not been heard of since.

With a draft plan unlikely to be ready until spring 2019, the risks of running into pre-election purdah meant the publication of the first consultation draft has been rescheduled for June 2019, two years behind the original timetable. This is presumably contingent on no major political changes arising from the council elections on 2 May.

The consultation on the draft plan is now scheduled for June 2019, conveniently after May’s round of local elections.

The extent to which the absence of a definitive GESP will be used by councils – and particularly Devon County Council as transport authority – for delaying urgently-needed measures to improve air quality through reducing the need to travel, managing down traffic volumes and prioritising cycling, walking and public transport remains to be seen.


Democracy doesn't work when people don't know who is deciding what on whose behalf and what the costs and consequences of those decisions will be.

Exeter Observer is proving that reader-funded media can deliver the independent public interest journalism our local democracy needs.

Upgrade to a paid Exeter Observer subscription to support our work and get access to exclusive premium content and more.

More stories
Northbrook swimming pool

City council holds sham Northbrook swimming pool closure consultation

£600,000 Exeter Leisure services budget cut signed off two weeks before pool consultation opened as St Sidwell’s Point drains other council leisure sites.

Met Office building at Exeter Science Park

Met Office to sell Exeter Science Park supercomputer and office buildings

Disposal motivated by replacement of nine year-old supercomputer with £1.2 billion government-funded off-site Microsoft facility.

St Petrock's outreach workers with a rough sleeper

Annual city council rough sleeper count “consistently underestimates” extent of Exeter rough sleeping

Homelessness charity St Petrock’s calls on council to change count methodology which identifies fewer rough sleepers than those known by outreach workers and reflected in government figures.

Devon County Council budget meeting 20 February 2025

Devon County Council reveals perilous financial state with SEND spending having “significant impact” on cash balances

5.9% budget increase for 2025-26 conceals £22 million cuts and £66 million cost increases with “inevitable” impact on “vital” services.

Grace Road Fields March 2025

Exeter Energy insists Riverside Valley Park only viable heat plant site but fails to explain Marsh Barton brownfield rejection

Company admits River Exe water source connection merely “potential” after 2036, incinerator connection only “possible” after 2030 and solar array “will not” meet plant electricity demand while statutory objections challenge Grace Road Fields plans.

Exeter Community Lottery revenue distribution FAQ

Exeter Community Lottery income spent on gambling licence fees and costs despite council marketing and point of sale claims

Materially misleading claims that 60% of ticket sales revenue goes to good causes repeatedly made on lottery website and in official council communications as Australian multinational profits from local voluntary and community sector support.

On Our Radar
Titus Andronicus by Nicholas Rowe

THURSDAY 3 APRIL 2025

Titus Andronicus

Lightbear Lane hosts a reading of Shakespeare’s bloody revenge tale.

ST NICHOLAS PRIORY

Jess Hughes Cameron and Chin See at 2024 Topsham Music Festival

FRIDAY 25 TO SUNDAY 27 APRIL 2025

2025 Topsham Music Festival

Three day event features jazz, percussion and classical music played by young professional musicians from across the country.

TOPSHAM

Liberation in Venice 1945

SUNDAY 27 APRIL 2025

Festa Di Liberazione

Italian Cultural Association Exeter hosts a day of music, dance, poetry and Italian culture.

KALEIDER