NEWS

Developers claim council planning committee refusal was “if not malevolent, certainly misguided”

Appeal against decision to deny fifth additional storey in build-to-rent scheme above Crankhouse Coffee accuses councillors of seeking to “appease the weight of objectors’ orchestrated opinion” against amendments to eleven year-old consent.

Martin Redfern with Leigh Curtis

An appeal has been lodged against an Exeter City Council decision to refuse the addition of a fifth storey to a four-storey city centre scheme that was approved eleven years ago but has not been built.

Proposals to increase the height of the building, which fronts onto Fore Street but extends down West Street towards Grade I listed St Mary Steps church, were rejected at a meeting of the council planning committee in September last year.

They prompted 140 objections, which cited a wide range of potential impacts including the loss of commercial space on the ground and lower ground floors. The building currently houses Rochelle’s Curtains & Blinds in Fore Street and Crankhouse Coffee in West Street.

The scheme’s architect expressed surprise at the volume of objections, said the majority had been orchestrated by Crankhouse Coffee and claimed that those who were opposed to the scheme must have misunderstood it.

The original plans were to rework the existing buildings, adding one full and one stepped-back storey to the West Street elevation and removing all commercial space to provide thirteen flats.

The revised scheme included the addition of another storey and the enlargement of the top floor with reconfigured, reduced commercial space below. It would also provide thirteen flats, all for rent, none of which would be affordable.

Illustrative West Street elevations of approved vs refused schemes Illustrative West Street elevations of approved vs refused schemes. Image: Exeter City Council.

A council planning officer recommended approval of the revised scheme, saying that the additional storey would not have significant visual or heritage impacts and that the changes would not increase the loss of privacy, light or amenity to neighbours compared with the original plans.

Council planning committee members saw the revised scheme proposals differently. Steve Warwick said that the decision to approve the original plans had shocked many people and that another storey would add insult to injury.

Diana Moore, speaking on behalf of all three councillors for St David’s ward, in which the building stands, said the developers’ claim that the additional storey would have limited impact was “very subjective”.

Andy Ketchin added that the much larger single step down from the proposed additional storey to adjacent buildings meant the compatibility with the surrounding area present in the original plans had been lost.

Height, scale, massing, the impact on nearby heritage assets and the outlook and amenity for neighbouring residential dwellings were all also cited in the resulting council refusal notice.

Corner of Fore Street and West Street with St Mary Steps church in the background Corner of Fore Street and West Street with St Mary Steps church in the background

The original redevelopment plans were approved in January 2013 and full planning permission granted the following month. Consent was conditional on development commencing within three years.

Two years later a council planning officer accepted minor preparation works for a basement bin store as sufficient to constitute commencement and the planning permission became permanent.

However no further redevelopment works took place. The original applicant died during the pandemic and the buildings were sold on to a new developer with planning consent intact.

The original architect was commissioned to prepare the revised plans.

Illustrative view of revised proposals Illustrative view of revised proposals

The architect claims, in a statement justifying the appeal against the council’s refusal of those plans, that planning committee members rejected them because of a “political reaction to 139 objectors and a ward member opposing the application”.

The statement says that they did so to “appease the weight of objectors’ orchestrated opinion and satisfy their own predisposition against a scheme their authority previously approved”, adding that their refusal was “if not malevolent, certainly misguided”.

It also says that the decision was based on a “retrospective reassessment” of the previously-approved plans arrived at by “viewing of the proposals as a whole, rather than merely assessing the revised section relating to the application”.

Adding that “none of these are legitimate planning grounds for refusal” it concludes, in effect, that the council planning officer’s recommendation to approve the revised proposals should simply have been passed.

It doesn’t explain in what circumstances, if any, councillors might make a decision at variance with officer recommendations as elected planning committee members.

Subscribe to The Exeter Digest - Exeter Observer's essential free email newsletter

Your personal information will be processed and stored in accordance with our Privacy Policy

The council’s response is that the officer’s report was not a “clear-cut position of approval for the scheme” and that, because a decade had passed between the original and revised proposals, committee discussion of both was relevant to its decision.

It adds that the committee’s refusal reasons were correctly based on material increases in height, massing and scale that would result from the revised scheme alongside its conclusion that they would cause significant harm.

A planning inspector will decide the appeal later this year.


Democracy doesn't work when people don't know who is deciding what on whose behalf and what the costs and consequences of those decisions will be.

Exeter Observer is proving that reader-funded media can deliver the independent public interest journalism our local democracy needs.

Upgrade to a paid Exeter Observer subscription to support our work and get access to exclusive premium content and more.

More stories
Northbrook Swimming Pool campaign demonstration Exeter Guildhall 13 May 2025

Campaigners compel Exeter City Council to reconsider Northbrook pool closure with 2,250-strong resident petition

Pressure on council intensifies after freedom of information request responses confirm £3.5 million budget cuts included potentially unlawful decision to close swimming pool without public consultation or impact assessment.

Wild camping on Dartmoor

Supreme Court rejects Dartmoor landowners’ attempt to prevent wild camping on their land

Judges unanimously dismiss appeal by Alexander and Diana Darwall against 2023 ruling upholding Dartmoor Commons Act as campaigners call for enhanced public rights to access nature pledged by Labour when still in opposition.

Child on park bench

Ofsted finds Devon County Council children’s services remain “inadequate” with rating unchanged since 2020

Inspection report highlights “serious weaknesses” that are “leaving children at risk of harm” as failings echo poor Special Educational Needs & Disabilities provision.

Mid Devon District Council headquarters at Phoenix House in Tiverton

Mid Devon District Council mischarged 2,865 social housing tenants £15.5 million in rent over twenty years

Housing regulator identifies “serious failings” in application of rent standard as council discovers dozens of evictions in which “rent arrears were the sole, or contributory factor”.

Dartmoor wildfire on 5 May 2025, photo by Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service

Dartmoor National Park warns of continued high fire risk after wildfire destroys 1,230 acres of moorland

Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service took nearly 24 hours to extinguish bank holiday weekend blaze that followed warning of uncontrolled moorland fire risk.

Former Firezza in Sidwell Street to become adult gaming centre

24 hour year-round Sidwell Street “adult gaming centre” allowed at appeal

Planning inspector finds no evidence that “increase in crime and disorder” or “serious detrimental impacts on the health of local residents” would result from change of use from restaurant and takeaway unit.

On Our Radar
Exeter Respect Festival

SATURDAY 7 & SUNDAY 8 JUNE 2025

Exeter Respect Festival 2025

The annual celebration of Exeter diversity returns for its 28th anniversary with live music and performance, food stalls, community and campaign groups.

BELMONT PARK

Exeter City Of Literature literary map

SUNDAY 8 JUNE 2025

The Book Market 2025

Exeter City of Literature event features independent booksellers from across the county with author talks, stalls, food and drink.

CATHEDRAL GREEN

Exeter Custom House

SUNDAY 8 JUNE 2025

Heritage Harbour Festival 2025

The maritime-themed event returns for a third year with steam boats, exhibitions, talks, live music, film screenings and more.

EXETER QUAY

Art Week Exeter 2025 graphic

MONDAY 9 TO SUNDAY 15 JUNE 2025

Art Week Exeter 2025

Festival returns with exhibitions, film screenings, talks, workshops, performances, social events and an art car boot sale.

EXETER CITY CENTRE

Pipe organ keyboard in St Mary's Church, Throwleigh by Andrew Abbott

SATURDAY 14 JUNE 2025

Lost and Found (Keyboards Revoiced)

Exeter Contemporary Sounds and Ian Summers perform works on rescued, repurposed and reimagined instruments.

EXETER LIBRARY

Exeter Philharmonic Choir in Exeter Cathedral

SATURDAY 14 JUNE 2025

A Feast of English Choral Music

Exeter Philharmonic Choir performs works by English composers.

EXETER CATHEDRAL