Democracy doesn't work when people don't know  Upgrade to paid

FEATURES

Exeter City Futures secondment decision may be unlawful

Backbench city councillors denied scrutiny call-in powers to challenge controversial decision to send chief executive and senior director to work for private company.

Martin Redfern

At the end of last year Exeter City Council controversially decided to send its chief executive, Karime Hassan, and another senior director, Jo Yelland, to work for Exeter City Futures for a total of five days a week while continuing to receive their council salaries.

The decision was ostensibly taken to support Net Zero Exeter plan delivery, although both are expected to focus on enabling Exeter Development Fund.

Neither the rationale nor the risk assessment provided by council leader Phil Bialyk in his report recommending the decision stood up to scrutiny.

It subsequently emerged that a cross-party group of backbench councillors attempted to challenge the decision under local government scrutiny call-in powers, but were told they could not do so.

The council claimed that the decision was for the full council, not its executive, to make and so was not subject to call-in.

However local government legislation appears to say otherwise, which would make the decision unlawful, ineffective and subject to judicial review.

Exeter City Council in session at Exeter Guildhall Exeter City Council in session at Exeter Guildhall. Photo: © Sandra Barrett, All Rights Reserved.

The legislation that governs Exeter City Council decision-making requires full council meetings to determine overall policy frameworks and budgets which its executive then implements (sometimes via executive sub-committees or council members and officials using delegated powers).

Accompanying regulations specify what local authority executives may do, what they may not do, and what they may only do in conjunction with the full council.

Backbench councillors are responsible for holding executive decisions and their implementation to account in scrutiny committees on which executive members may not sit.

Some other council decisions concerning regulatory matters including audit, planning and licensing are mostly made by non-executive committees.

Backbench councillors sitting on scrutiny committees have legal powers to “call in” executive decisions, delaying their implementation so they can be subjected to greater scrutiny, with the option to recommend that they are reconsidered and potentially overturned.

Statutory government guidance says that all council “members and officers should recognise and appreciate the importance and legitimacy the scrutiny function is afforded by the law”. It describes scrutiny as a “check and balance on the executive”.

Key decisions

(1) In these Regulations a “key decision” means an executive decision, which is likely —

(a) to result in the relevant local authority incurring expenditure which is, or the making of savings which are, significant having regard to the relevant local authority’s budget for the service or function to which the decision relates; or

(b) to be significant in terms of its effects on communities living or working in an area comprising two or more wards or electoral divisions in the area of the relevant local authority.

Extracts from: The Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012, Part 3, Regulation 8.

Executive decisions which are likely to result in significant expenditure (or savings) against council-set budgets , or which are likely to have a significant effect on communities living or working in an area comprising two or more council electoral wards are called “key decisions”.

What constitutes “significant” in this context is not defined by the regulations. Many local authorities consider expenditure (or savings) of £100,000 or more to be significant, although Exeter City Council only applies this to expenditure above £1 million. The meaning of “significant effect on communities” is less clear.

Somewhat confusingly, local authority executives may also make decisions which involve significant expenditure but are nevertheless not key decisions, because the executive is restricted to recommending its decision to the full council for approval.

These are decisions which would be “contrary to or not wholly in accordance with the authority’s budget” or “contrary to a plan or strategy adopted or approved by the authority”. They are known as “departure decisions” and must be made by the full council.

Exeter City Council policy framework

The policy framework is made up of a series of statutory plans and strategies as follows:

  • Corporate Plan
  • Development Plan Documents forming the Local Development Framework
  • Food Law Enforcement Service Plan
  • Climate Change Strategy
  • Contaminated Land Strategy
  • Annual Budget Strategy
  • Asset Management Plan
  • Health and Safety Service Plan
  • Housing Strategy (including Private Sector Housing Renewal Policy)
  • Anti-Social Behaviour Policy
  • Homelessness Strategy
  • Community Safety Strategy
  • Recycling Plan
  • Licensing Policy Statement
  • Gambling Policy Statement.

Extracts from: Exeter City Council constitution, Article 4.

The decision to send two council directors to work for Exeter City Futures relied on existing budgets, as the council leader’s report confirms, and it was not related to the council’s current policy framework, as the council’s constitution confirms.

As the decision involved neither budget nor policy framework changes it appears not to be departure decision. If so, it should have been taken by the executive and not the full council.

It apparently should also have been classified as a key decision as, according to the council, it affected all the city’s electoral wards.

As such it should have been subject to call-in too. However the non-partisan cross-party group of backbench councillors which attempted to challenge the decision under scrutiny call-in powers was prevented from doing so by the council on the basis that the decision was not an executive decision at all.

The local government legislation which binds the council appears to say otherwise, which would make the decision unlawful, ineffective and subject to judicial review.

Subscribe to The Exeter Digest - Exeter Observer's essential free email newsletter

Your personal information will be processed and stored in accordance with our Privacy Policy

We asked the council to tell us specifically which section of which schedule of the legislation it considers applies such that the decision to send the council’s chief executive and another senior director to work for Exeter City Futures did not constitute an executive decision.

We had to ask four times before we received an answer, more than two months after the decision was made.

Instead of referring to the legislation, the council quoted the sections of its constitution related to its powers to appoint its own chief executive and head of paid service (a statutory role played by the chief executive in Exeter).

These have nothing to do with its decision to send the chief executive and another director to work for Exeter City Futures.

According to the council’s externally-audited accounts, Exeter City Futures is neither a subsidiary nor associate company of the council. The council therefore has no powers to appoint the company’s staff, whether already employed by the council or anyone else.

Democracy doesn't work when people don't know

Public interest news that holds power and influence to account is more important now than it has ever been.

Democracy doesn't work when people don't know who is deciding what on whose behalf and what the costs and consequences of those decisions will be.

Exeter Observer was built to deliver the independent investigative journalism our local democracy needs.

It exists because people who think what we do matters and are willing to chip in each month to help cover our costs.

We need more of our readers to contribute like this so we can keep producing and publishing our essential reporting.

133 of the 300 paying subscribers we need have signed up so far. Join them today to help us reach our goal, if you haven't already.

If you value the work we do please upgrade to a paid Exeter Observer subscription from less than £2/week. It's a small investment for a very big return.

Upgrade to paid

More stories
Grace Road Fields in March

Botched consultation restarted on sale of 8.5 acres of Riverside Valley Park green space

Council land disposal to include rights to lay underground distribution pipework across River Exe floodplain following “low-to-zero carbon” Grace Road Fields heat plant planning approval in face of Environment Agency sequential test concerns.

September 2025 permitted replacement scheme west elevation

Council denies data and contrives criteria to dismiss community balance concerns in third King Billy student block approval

Exeter Observer analysis finds more students living in city centre than residents as council bid to include PBSA in housing delivery figures weakens local planning policy – but does not remove it from decision-making altogether.

Exeter College and Petroc campuses map

Exeter College and Petroc merger set to create largest college group in South West

Colleges hold public consultation on creation of new organisation which they say would educate 16,000 students at Exeter and North Devon campuses and employ 2,000 staff with £100 million turnover.

Proposed Clarendon House student block aerial view

Proposals to replace Clarendon House with 297-bed student accommodation complex submitted for approval

Developer Zinc Real Estate arrives at final proposal for up to ten storey Paris Street roundabout redevelopment after nearly two years of informal public consultations and meetings with city councillors and officers.

Nadder Park Road application site location map

Barley Lane greenfield plans place persistent threat to Exeter’s north and north-west hills in spotlight

Council inability to identify sufficient land to meet government housing delivery targets leaves residents with faint hope of local plan policies preventing Nadder Park Road ridgeline development despite 175 public objections to scheme.

On Our Radar
Two Moors Festival musicians performing

WEDNESDAY 1 TO SUNDAY 12 OCTOBER 2025

Two Moors Festival

Chamber music festival celebrates 25th anniversary with performances, talks and workshops across fifteen venues.

DARTMOOR, EXMOOR & SURROUNDS

Play Interact Explore installation

SATURDAY 4 OCTOBER TO SUNDAY 2 NOVEMBER 2025

Play Interact Explore

Theatre Alibi hosts an interactive exhibition suitable for all ages created by artists Leap then Look.

EMMANUEL HALL

Still from How the Little Mole Got His Trousers

SATURDAY 18 OCTOBER 2025

Nature’s Resources

A programme of six short animated films explores the relationship between humans and non-human species.

EXETER PHOENIX